Our Revolution’s Logic

At The American Mind, Angelo Codevilla provides us with this essay that takes a hard look at the revolution in which we find ourselves. And make no mistake, this is a revolution. It is a fight that has been imposed upon us by a hostile force; Marxist leftism. And those who call themselves “Progressive” (nothing could be further from the truth) have taken it as a given that they are our superiors and that therefore they can treat us, not as equals to be respected, but as ruled to be suppressed by any means necessary.

We, the deplorables of the nation, have fought back in the way that comes naturally to us; we vote. And over the last decade, we have removed Democrats from elected office all across the country. Depending on whose numbers you use, up to 1200 seats have been taken from the Democrats and given to the only available alternative; the Republicans. But the “Progressives” don’t recognize the legitimacy of anyone other than themselves any longer and have formed “the resistance.”

This state of affairs is clearly unstable and as time goes on one side must win over the other. Who that may be, remains to be seen, but it is clear that the left cannot be allowed to win if we, the deplorables, wish to have anything resembling a normal life and to retain some measure of our freedom. The left puts people into gulags or worse, as we know from a study of the history of the 20th century. Millions put to death for not bowing down before the hateful regimes of communist countries is a fact, and there is no reason to think that the left wouldn’t do the same thing here. The left is made up of people with serious mental illnesses who must take out their self-hatred on others to assuage their own weak amygdalae. For them, there is no peace, only a continual assault on the normal people who vex them. And so here we are, fighting a fight against the mentally unstable, who have amassed the power to impose their hate on all of the rest of us whether we like it or not.

The logic that drives each turn of our revolutionary spiral is Progressive Americans’ inherently insatiable desire to exercise their superiority over those they deem inferior. With Newtonian necessity, each such exercise causes a corresponding and opposite reaction. The logic’s force comes not from the substance of the Progressives’ demands. If that were the case, acquiescing to or compromising with them could cut it short. Rather, it comes from that which moves, changes, and multiplies their demands without end. That is the Progressives’ affirmation of superior worth, to be pursued by exercising dominance: superior identity affirmed via the inferior’s humiliation. It is an inherently endless pursuit.

The logic is rooted in disdain, but not so much of any of the supposed inferiors’ features or habits. If it were, the deplored could change their status by improving. But the Progressives deplore the “deplorables” not to improve them, but to feel good about themselves. Hating people for what they are and because it feels good to hate them, is hate in its unalloyed form.

Our time’s sharp distinction between rulers and ruled, the ever decreasing interchange and sympathy between them, is rooted in the disdain for ordinary Americans that the universities have sown since the Civil War. Ordinary Americans and their rulers are alienated now in ways unimaginable to the Northerners and Southerners who killed each other a century and a half ago, but who nodded when Abraham Lincoln noted that they “prayed to the same God.” Both revered the American founding. Both aspired to the same family life. Often, opposite sides’ generals were personal friends. And why not? The schools they attended, the books they read, did not teach them the others’ inferiority. They were one people. Now, we are no longer one people.

In our time, the most widespread of differences between rulers and ruled is also the deepest: The ruled go to church and synagogue. The rulers are militantly irreligious and contemptuous of those who are not. Progressives since Herbert Croly’s and Woodrow Wilson’s generation have nursed a superiority complex. They distrust elections because they think that power should be in expert hands—their own. They believe that the U.S Constitution gave too much freedom to ordinary Americans and not enough power to themselves, and that America’s history is one of wrongs. The books they read pretend to argue scientifically that the rest of Americans are racist, sexist, maybe fascists, but above all stupid. For them, Americans are harmful to themselves and to the world, and have no right to self-rule. That is why our revolution started from a point more advanced in its logic than many others.

The anti-establishment “wave elections” of 2010 and 2014, in which the Democratic Party lost Congress and control of a majority of state legislatures, only led America’s Progressive rulers to double down on their positions of power in the judiciary, the media, corporations, etc. The Supreme Court struck down a referendum by liberal California defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The federal Defense of Marriage Act, which had become law by near-unanimity, was overturned bureaucratically and judicially. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, on the books just as firmly, was undone by executive, judicial, bureaucratic, corporate, and mediatic subordination of religious freedom to anti-discrimination. By the 2016 election, America’s Progressive rulers were demonizing and punishing persons who define male and female by their birth and personal plumbing. 1984’s Big Brother had not been so imperious.

Posted in Activism, Communism, Conservatism, Corruption, Democrats, Government Tyranny, Marxism, Political Correctness, The Angry Left, The Culture War, The Ruling Class | Comments Off on Our Revolution’s Logic

A Message From Gab

In case you are not aware, Gab is the free speech alternative to the Silicon Valley approved and censored platform Twitter, which has made it their mission to silence conservatives and to otherwise control the narrative in such a way as to benefit Democrats and the left. They have now had to go offline temporarily in order to find a new host since the leftist who dominate these social media platforms have pulled their access to their servers.

And no Tammy Bruce, it’s not OK to silence people en mass just because you happen to disagree with something someone wrote and who posted it on Gab. That’s what the left does. That’s not what conservatives believe in. We value free speech, even when we know we disagree with it. That’s the whole point of the 1st amendment. You get to have your say no matter what.

So Gab will be back as soon as they can get some new servers set up. No telling how long that might be, but you can’t stop the signal.

Gab has spent the past 48 hours proudly working with the DOJ and FBI to bring justice to an alleged terrorist. Because of the data we provided, they now have plenty of evidence for their case. In the midst of this Gab has been no-platformed by essential internet infrastructure providers at every level. We are the most censored, smeared, and no-platformed startup in history, which means we are a threat to the media and to the Silicon Valley Oligarchy.

Gab isn’t going anywhere.

It doesn’t matter what you write. It doesn’t matter what the sophist talking heads say on TV. It doesn’t matter what verified nobodies say on Twitter. We have plenty of options, resources, and support. We will exercise every possible avenue to keep Gab online and defend free speech and individual liberty for all people.

You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech they disagree with to interfere in a US election.

The internet is not reality. TV is not reality. 80% of normal everyday people agree with Gab and support free expression and liberty. The online outrage mob and mainstream media spin machine are the minority opinion. People are waking up, so please keep pointing the finger at a social network instead of pointing the finger at the alleged shooter who holds sole responsibility for his actions.

No-platform us all you want. Ban us all you want. Smear us all you want.

You can’t stop an idea.

As we transition to a new hosting provider Gab will be inaccessible for a period of time. We are working around the clock to get Gab.com back online. Thank you and remember to speak freely.

Andrew Torba, CEO Gab.com

Posted in Activism, Conservatism, Cuckservatives, Democrats, New Media, Technology, The Angry Left, The Culture War, The Elite Media Monoculture, The Ruling Class | Comments Off on A Message From Gab

More Fun With NPC

Posted in Activism, Democrats, Feminism, Marxism, New Media, Political Correctness, The Angry Left, The Culture War, The Deep State | Comments Off on More Fun With NPC

A Revolution Is Under Way

Tucker Carlson has a better handle on what’s going on in politics than many mainstream conservatives who still see the current situation as a battle between Democrats and Republicans. And while there are some individuals who still represent the older status quo, the fight we are now seeing is really about the Cabal vs the People. Regular Americans keep voting to reform and fix the current system, and we have been doing so since the tea-party elections of 2010. Cabal inc. keeps working to stop the change. The election of Donald Trump is, in this context, not a cause but rather an effect of a change which has already occurred in the population and is working its way through the society and the political machinery. Tucker Carlson expands on this idea at The Independent.

The less control you have, the more hysterical you become.

Dying regimes are the same way. They get more repressive as they fade. As their power ebbs, rulers lash out against dissent and disobedience. Deposed Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceauşescu barked orders at his guards as they led him to the firing squad.

Our leaders understood Donald Trump’s election as a direct challenge to their power. They’ve been fretting about his authoritarian tendencies ever since. Because they lack self-awareness, they don’t perceive this as projection. They can’t see that they’re actually talking about themselves.

Let’s say you were an authoritarian who sought to weaken American democracy. How would you go about doing that? You’d probably start by trying to control what people say and think. If citizens dissented from the mandated orthodoxy, or dared to consider unauthorized ideas, then you’d hurt them. You’d shame them on social media. You’d shout them down in public. You’d get them fired from their jobs. You’d make sure everyone was afraid to disagree with you.

After that, you’d work to disarm the population: You’d take away their guns. That way, they would be entirely dependent on you for safety, not to mention unable to resist your plans for them. Then, just to make sure you’d quelled all opposition, you’d systematically target any institution that might oppose or put brakes on your power. You’d be especially concerned about churches, the family and independent businesses. You’d be sure to undermine and crush those, using laws and relentless propaganda.

If, despite all this, election results still didn’t go your way, you’d use an unelected bureaucracy to neuter any leader you hadn’t handpicked yourself. But you’d be shaken by an election like that. You’d resolve never to allow one again. To make sure of that, you’d work tirelessly to replace the old and ungrateful population with a new and more obedient one. That’s what you’d do.

Sound familiar? For all of his many faults, President Trump isn’t doing any of that. Our ruling class is.

Posted in Corruption, Democrats, Government Tyranny, Political Correctness, Republicans, The Angry Left, The Culture War, The Deep State, The Ruling Class | Comments Off on A Revolution Is Under Way

The NPC Meme

I’m not a gamer so I had not heard of this, but apparently, there is a thing called a Non-Playing Character that you often find in video games. They are not controlled by the player and often exist just to repeat information they are programmed to repeat. Sort of like a talking stop light or something. In any event, some enterprising anons on the chat-boards noticed that liberals and leftists have a lot in common with these pre-programmed automatons in that they also tend not to have any active thought processes, just repeat slogans and generally do what they are programmed to do. Thus was born the newest weapon in the meme-war against the hysterical angry left. The New York Times and Breitbart have both run stories on this, which shows you just how upset the left is about it.

Several months ago, users on 4chan and Reddit, the online message forums, started using the term NPC to refer to liberals. These people, they said, join the anti-Trump crowd not because they are led by independent thought or conscience to oppose President Trump’s policies, but because they’re brainwashed sheep who have been conditioned to parrot left-wing orthodoxy, in the manner of a scripted character.

As a Reddit user, BasedMedicalDoctor, explains in a thread about the appeal of the meme, NPCs are “completely dependent on their programming, and can’t do or think on their own.”

Posted in Activism, Communism, Democrats, New Media, Political Correctness, Technology, The Angry Left, The Culture War | Comments Off on The NPC Meme

Kavanaugh Leftist Meltdown

Our friends at Breitbart, may their name be forever blessed, have brought us this hilarious and disturbing video. In it, we see the meltdown and hysteria that is the modern left and the Democrat party. If you vote for them in November, you’re going to be getting a lot more of this sort of insanity.

Posted in Activism, Black Societal Failure, Communism, Conservatism, Democrats, Election, Feminism, Marxism, The Angry Left, The Culture War | Comments Off on Kavanaugh Leftist Meltdown

Psychological Disorders Are the Platform of the Democrat Party

Rush talked about this topic on his Friday show and really, this is something that a lot of people have been noticing lately. These people on the left have real, serious problems. Normal people don’t act and speak the way they do. And as more and more regular Americans realize just how out-to-lunch the left is, the less they will be willing to trust them with power.

RUSH: I just ran into this story. This is from our buddies at NewsBusters. “Feminist Author Jill Filipovic Demands Women ‘Divorce Your Republican Husbands’ — [F]eminist author Jill Filipovic … tweeted instructions to her fellow scorned women on how to get back at the man. ‘Divorce your Republican husbands.’” This is why I say, ladies and gentlemen, that I think a lot of political activists are actually victims of psychological issues and are projecting it onto the world of politics.

I think… I really do. I think this is the way to explain much of liberalism, that they have victimized so many people, made them think they’re victims. That means they’re helpless, things are hopeless. Everything’s stacked against ’em. Whatever’s wrong in their lives, it’s somebody else’s fault. The Democrat Party has lassoed all these people and has promised to fix things for them by getting even with the people who are responsible for mistreating
’em, which happens to be white, male Republicans.

This is so deranged. “Divorce your Republican…”? She’s serious! “Divorce your Republican husbands.” That’s how we get back at what the Republicans are doing to Dr. Ford. “You get even with ’em! You divorce your Republican husband.” She’s serious about it. She’s tweeting it out there. People are treating it seriously. This is deranged. This is a psychological disorder of some merit, some degree. You read something like this and you can’t help laugh at it, and then you realize they’re serious.

Get even with the Republicans for what they’ve done to Dr. Ford by divorcing your Republican husband and take him for all he’s worth. Now, somebody tell me that that’s rational. Tell me it’s a rational way to think, that it’s a rational solution to a problem. None of it is rational! But it makes perfect sense if you look at these people rather than being political activists, that they are first people with psychological disorders who have found their way into the political system and been validated.

Their psychological disorder, their mess, whatever it is, has been validated by the Democrat Party, which then goes and makes policy based on all of this, and then it finds its way into the curriculum at universities in the form of women’s studies curricula and other such things.

Posted in Conservatism, Democrats, Feminism, Social Justice Warriors, The Angry Left, The Culture War | Comments Off on Psychological Disorders Are the Platform of the Democrat Party

Bombard’s Body Language

Bombard’s Body Language comments on the body language of politicians, celebrities and others who would try to put one over on the rubes. She consistently targets those who are pushing the standard party line that the elites want us to believe, so of course, she was banned from YouTube. But fortunately we can get the same great commentary on BitChute.

Posted in Activism, Conservatism, Democrats, Fake News, Government Tyranny, Political Correctness, Social Justice Warriors, The Angry Left, The Culture War, The Deep State | Comments Off on Bombard’s Body Language

Senator Lindsey Graham Lets Dems Have It

I have never seen Senator Lindsey Graham let go like this and I would imagine this came as a surprise to quite a few. I have been critical of the Senator in the past and this is well outside his normal demeanor. No question that he was rightly pissed off.

Posted in Activism, Communism, Corruption, Democrats, Political Correctness, Republicans, Social Justice Warriors, The Culture War | Comments Off on Senator Lindsey Graham Lets Dems Have It

Do It For Denmark

If Western governments have to actually advertise to get men interested, you know there’s a problem. Feminism has resulted in falling birthrates all across the developed world. So it’s hard not to laugh at this video knowing where the problem really is. Of course guys want to be with cute women. But the reality is that feminism has made those women into something that men no longer want. And then governments that have adopted feminist policies have to figure out how to fund their massive social programs when there are no young people being born who would have been paying the taxes needed to fund them.

Posted in Economics, Feminism, Political Correctness, Social Justice Warriors, The Culture War | Comments Off on Do It For Denmark

The Culture of Critique Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck

The Culture of Critique is part of a three-volume academic work by retired professor Kevin MacDonald of California State University. These works by professor MacDonald are naturally controversial given the current dominance of leftism, multi-culturalism, open-borders insanity and political correctness that have come to dominate our popular culture over the decades. As time has gone on, however, and as more and more dissident information is made available on the internet, common narratives have started to come under greater scrutiny. This closer examination is clearly needed and deserved when we observe the fact that our country is changing in radical ways that most of us never voted for nor approve. And when we look into the details, as professor MacDonald has, we find that one group, in particular, has been at the forefront of those damaging changes.

This review of The Culture of Critique by Stanley Hornbeck covers the major arguments of the book and is a good introduction to Kevin MacDonald’s work and may persuade you to take a deeper look into these ideas, if you have the courage to explore territory that The Elite Media Monoculture would have you avoid, assuming you knew about it at all. And if you want to, you can download a copy of MacDonald’s book here.

In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements – largely established and led by Jews – have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.

The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald’s massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile relations and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.

The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis, Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald’s most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty – that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong Jewish identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of the institute’s activities: “Research would be able here to transform itself directly into propaganda,” he wrote. (Italics in the original.)

Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the Frankfurt school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and Emotional Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality was particularly influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the American Jewish Committee heavily funded its promotion and because Jewish academics took up its message so enthusiastically.

The book’s purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion to family – and race – loyalty are signs of a dangerous and defective “authoritarian personality.” Because drawing distinctions between different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties – even close family ties! – are “prejudice.” As Christopher Lasch has written, the book leads to the conclusion that prejudice “could be eradicated only by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy – by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum.”

But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof. MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even described Jewish group identity – only that of gentiles: “behavior that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary strategy is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles.”

For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of mental illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt school was enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which “Oedipal ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in early childhood are the anti-Semite’s irrevocable inheritance.”

In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof. MacDonald sees the school as a seminal influence: “Certainly many of the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status, family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism.”

Posted in (((The Hollows))), Activism, Communism, Education, Immigration, Marxism, Phenocentrism, Social Justice Warriors, The Culture War, The Elite Media Monoculture, The Ruling Class | Comments Off on The Culture of Critique Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck

American Pravda: The Nature of Anti-Semitism

Ron Unz, founder of the Unz Review and a secular Jew, brings us this essay on the nature of Anti-Semitism and comes to some very unorthodox conclusions about our standard narratives and perceptions. he argues here that we might want to reconsider some of our more common platitudes when it comes to evaluating the Jewish people and their role in history.

I recently published a couple of long essays, and although they primarily focused on other matters, the subject of anti-Semitism was a strong secondary theme. In that regard, I mentioned my shock at discovering a dozen or more years ago that several of the most self-evidently absurd elements of anti-Semitic lunacy, which I had always dismissed without consideration, were probably correct. It does seem likely that a significant number of traditionally-religious Jews did indeed occasionally commit the ritual murder of Christian children in order to use their blood in certain religious ceremonies, and also that powerful Jewish international bankers did play a large role in financing the establishment of Bolshevik Russia.

When one discovers that matters of such enormous moment not only apparently occurred but that they had been successfully excluded from nearly all of our histories and media coverage for most of the last one hundred years, the implications take some time to properly digest. If the most extreme “anti-Semitic canards” were probably true, then surely the whole notion of anti-Semitism warrants a careful reexamination.

All of us obtain our knowledge of the world by two different channels. Some things we discover from our own personal experiences and the direct evidence of our senses, but most information comes to us via external sources such as books and the media, and a crisis may develop when we discover that these two pathways are in sharp conflict. The official media of the old USSR used to endlessly trumpet the tremendous achievements of its collectivized agricultural system, but when citizens noticed that there was never any meat in their shops, “Pravda” became a watchword for “Lies” rather than “Truth.”

Posted in (((The Hollows))), Communism, Education, Fake News, Marxism, Political Correctness, Socialism, The Culture War, The Elite Media Monoculture, The Ruling Class | Comments Off on American Pravda: The Nature of Anti-Semitism

The Songs of Jeong & Lee

Counter-Currents brings us this lengthy article on the recent controversy wherein the New York Times hired a young, Asian “journalist” whose primary qualification for her position is that she holds a seething hatred and resentment for this country and the people, mostly white, who made it all possible.

The late founder of modern Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, is famous for observing: “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.” This axiom led Yew to state, years later, that “multiculturalism will destroy America.” But it is not just through voting that multiculturalist tribalism expresses itself; it manifests itself through culture in a myriad of forms: activist journalism and theatrical plays being just two of many possible avenues.

With the recent, illustrative examples of Sarah Jeong and Young Jean Lee, we can now discern the shape of an emerging “Asian women hating on white men” trend among the Left’s hepcat sophisticates, one that is rapidly transitioning towards the actual dehumanization of whites. (We could add Inkoo Kang, a staff writer in Slate’s culture department, as another example, but that’s for another day.)

By way of a Preface, it’s important to note that, per the emergent science of race realism, whites do not (and ought not to) dehumanize people of color (POCs). Rather, whites see POCs as a difference in kind, and largely incompatible with the underlying tenets of white culture. The empirical realities of human biodiversity (HBD) allow us to see, with greater and greater clarity, how civilizational differences are very much an offshoot of genetic differences plus time. Our political stance is informed by this knowledge; we come to see and appreciate the uniqueness of our very “way of being.” As members of this culture, it is natural to want to protect it, to not sit idly by while the necessary levels of homogeneity required to maintain this way of being are diluted by endless POC immigration.

Posted in Marxism, New Media, Political Correctness, Social Justice Warriors, The Angry Left, The Culture War, The Elite Media Monoculture | Comments Off on The Songs of Jeong & Lee